Posts Tagged ‘John Daly’
News
We will release the data…
Climategate: University of East Anglia U-turn in climate change row (Telegraph)
We threw away the data…
Climate change data dumped (Times)
The Climate Research Unit says, according to the Telegraph, that they will release the raw data that global warming is based upon. At the same time the Times reports that the same folks now admit that the raw data was thrown away. All they kept was the manipulated data they created to support global warming. As Roger Pielke, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University, is quoted in the Times, “The CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us’.”
News
Tell it to the ice caps, An e-mail storm worsens the climate for consensus (Washington Post)
Don’t let a little scientific fraud get in the way. Eugene Robinson whitewashes the débâcle that global warming to suggest “deniers” are getting ahead of themselves.
Didn’t anyone ever look at the code?!
There are several updates from folks reviewing the CRU software code that paint a devestating picture of the science of global warming (More below). As I read these, I keep coming back to the 1960 date. Newer data did not bear out global warming which global warming advocates had staked their careers. Therefore they played with it and made it up to get the results they wanted. What they seem to miss in this scientific fraud is that the newer data might be more relaible and that instead of it being wrong, maybe their old data and the entire approach or methodology was the problem.
The code documentation and write read me files releaseed last week are so incredibly unprofessional to be almost unbelieveable. They raise big red flags about what was transpiring. Didn’t anyone ever look at the code?!
CRU Code Review
A lot of folks are looking at the CRU Code that lays the foundation for the fraud of global warming. Bishop Hill has a growing list of findings (below). Bore Patch offers another take (above).
About George Monbiot’s “Apology”
Anthony Watts (WattsUpWithThat) and Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun) are out with new posts and articles noting a so-called “apology” from George Monbiot, “one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming faith.” (Watts). What apology?!
About the Commented Code Released by the Alleged Hacker
Anthony Watts at WattsUpWithThat has a new post out showing comments in the code that was released by the alleged hacker last week. First, he says further review of the email shows that among the datasets Phil Jones used, some concluded that ‘global warming’ ended back in 1960 and that only with edited dated to “hide the decline” did Jones produce the current global warming trend. He shares that Jones now denies manipulating the data even if the email clearly state otherwise.
Anyway, Watts says that a review of the software code released by the alleged hacker includes comments clearly documenting data manipulation.
Swiftboating the Climate Scientists
George Marshall writes in the block Climate Change Denial a post bemoaning “Swiftboating the Climate Scientists.”
The theft of 1,000 private e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA) shows that deniers have learned lessons from dirty politics and are running a new campaign to undermine public trust in climate scientists. The feeble response from the UEA and the climate science community shows that scientists are still totally underestimating the fragility of that trust and the crucial role it plays in building public belief.
1,073 Email and 55MB of Files: The Fraud of Global Warming Exposed
Hackers recently seized and released 1,073 emails and 55MB of files from Climate Report and the University of East Anglia. Not unexpected on today’s Internet but the results are explosive. The content of the emails unequivocally show that global warming is a fraud and that scientists involved actively perpetrated this fraud.
Like so many others I have downloaded the hacked files and have begun perusing the emails. First, I’ve got to suspect the scientists involved feel very violated to find their emails now on the Internet for everyone to read. Interesting to note that they are admitted as genuine from several media reports (Phil Jones admits files taken, defends content; Gavin Schmidt says his are genuine). Second, they should be concerned about repercussions, whether they should have attorneys, and maybe whether it might be time to quietly retire. For Al Gore and others making a career out of global warning, this has to be a bone chilling moment as their entire religious crusade is exposed as fraud. What do they do? Admit it? Explain it away? Or, try to ignore it?
News
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’? (Telegraph)
“If the Hadley CRU scandal is true,it’s a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility which is never likely to recover.”